Split–ticket voting in an STV system: choice in a non- strategic context
ثبت نشده
چکیده
This paper explores the sources of weak party–voting patterns in Irish elections, conceptualising this as split–ticket voting. Ireland provides a context where election results show split–ticket voting is common, but the strategic interpretations of such behaviour that have been very prominent elsewhere are not generally applicable. We employ data from the Irish national election studies to explore the behaviour of individuals embedded in a variety of contexts. The results demonstrate the prevalence of split–ticket voting, and they support the validity of non-strategic explanations. One source of explanation for the patterns we find lies in differences between individuals: partisanship, and the extent to which voters are attracted to candidates rather than parties are important. A second source is contextual: the factors connected with the complexity of the choice decision have to make have a powerful influence on split– ticket voting. Pre-print version of the accepted manuscript: Marsh, M. & Plescia, C. (2015) 'Split-ticket voting in an STV system: choice in a nonstrategic context', Irish Political Studies. DOI: doi: 10.1080/07907184.2015.1126923 Funding Carolina Plescia gratefully acknowledges the financial support offered by the Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Studies (IRCHSS) through its Ph.D. scholarship programme.
منابع مشابه
Single Transferable Vote Resists Strategic Voting
We give evidence that Single Tranferable Vote (STV) is computationally resistant to manipulation: It is NP-complete to determine whether there exists a (possibly insincere) preference that will elect a favored candidate, even in an election for a single seat. Thus strategic voting under STV is qualitatively more difficult than under other commonly-used voting schemes. Furthermore, this resistan...
متن کاملInstitutional - Constitutional Change and Political Behavior : The Municipal Elections in Tel - Aviv - Jaffa ( 1993 ) and Split Ticket Voting
The phenomenon of split ticket voting is intriguing, and has partially been explicated in the scientific literature. Studies have offered several inconclusive reasons why a voter may decide to split his/her vote, and to support rival candidates, and opposing political parties. The candidate’s visibility, on the one hand, and partisan identification, on the other hand, have been the most cited e...
متن کاملStrategic voting in established and new democracies: Ticket splitting in mixed-member electoral systems
Using Cox’s ’SF-ratio’ (the ratio of the vote won by the ’second loser’ to that of the ’first loser’), we examine strategic voting in mixed-member electoral systems in ten countries and a total of 35 elections. The SF-ratio is a useful indicator of strategic defection from less competitive to more competitive electoral options that is comparable across very diverse country cases. Under conditio...
متن کاملStrategic Voting in a Social Context: Considerate Equilibria
We investigate voting under the perspective of a strategic game. We take into account that the agents are members of a social network in which every group of individuals has consideration for their relatives. Agents are not fully selfish as they are reluctent to act in a way that harm their partners. The associated notion of equilibrium was introduced by Hoefer et al. [7] and called considerate...
متن کامل1 Voter strategies with restricted choice menus
Mixed-member electoral systems require voters simultaneously to cast ballots in single-member districts (SMD) and multimember, proportional representation (PR) constituencies. It may be that not all parties offer candidates in both electoral contexts, however. In this event would-be voters for some parties may find themselves “frustrated” by the restricted choice menu on offer in the SMD, being...
متن کامل